Kavanaugh's biggest media missed: The pieces that hit the Supreme Court supported humiliation

The protection of naming presidential candidates is filled with examples of wilted picks under political and media observations, such as Harriet Miers under George W. Bush or Tom Daschle under Barack Obama.

READ ALSO : Kofi Annan, who reset U.N., died at 80 years

However, one media network that will be reached in Trump's Supreme Court presidential candidate, Brett Kavanaugh, has had a devastating effect - not doing much of his image and, in some cases, denying the news that was published.

This includes the article 'revealing' how he spent a lot of money on baseball games and, more recently, a New York analysis of detail about his collegiate sports reported three decades ago - citing an academic, however, confirming that Kavanaugh's college basketball article shows he will confirm "unlimited presidential authority" under Trump.

For conservatives, the stories speak to efforts to struggle to "hack" other candidates who qualify. 

The New York Times added on the list when he published a recent story about how internal e-mails showed Kavanaugh "helped [Bush's] administration efforts to win Senate confirmation for one of the most debated candidates for judgment," despite testifying in 2006 nominating Charles W. Pickering Sr. "Not one of the judgment candidates I control."

This work reflects the Democratic question whether Kavanaugh has misled the Senate.

.

He said in a statement: "Although I work with a lawyer at the White House Counsel office, I cannot remember one interaction with Brett Kavanaugh about my judicial nomination. I also do not remember knowing his name at that time. His testimony in 2006 was correct."

The Daily Wire published a tearful Times story for the report, cynically writing that "they really" got Kavanaugh this time.

"Combine this by buying baseball tickets and love beers and they might just take this person," said the room.

This is a reference to some of the latest hits on Kavanaugh that cannot be denied.

 The paperwork at home in Kavanaugh caused "tens of thousands of dollars of credit card debt to buy baseball debt in the past decade" and waited until the fourth paragraph stated that he paid the bill.

ProPublica then took a step much earlier last week, asking readers to help find out who was present in the game with the title, "Are You Going to Washington Nationals with Supreme Court Candidate Brett Kavanaugh?" A strange position has a subhead, "Trump chose a baseball fan who has collected a lot of season-buying debt tickets. Help us think of who goes with the nominated judge."

"Expectations, apparently, the springs remain in the newsroom with the political agenda," wrote Thomas Jipping's National Review in response to ProPublica's work.

NewsBusters Senior Editor Curtis Houck told Fox News that a ProPublica piece "should be included in the dictionary under what 'fishing expeditions' look like."

Then there was a new dive published by The New Yorker about college sports articles Kavanaugh wrote for the Yale Daily News in the mid-1980s - looking for clues "how he would rule on critical issues."

The article asked, "Can there be any indication of a potential Supreme Court decision under titles like 'Elis Trounce Jaspers' and 'Hoopsters Head West?'" The prestigious magazine carries "experts," including a veteran Sports Illustrated writer and Northwestern professor, Harvard and Yale explained that sports articles from the past three decades could predict their position about the Supreme Court's decision.

Share Facebook

Share Twitter

Share Google+

Share LinkedIn